Housing Minister David Eby recently announced a proposal for government to build housing for the middle class.

He said,  “Building public housing on public land for middle-class families was never something government needed to do when I was growing up — generally, the private sector looked after it.”

The private sector could still look after it, if municipal councils stopped obstructing rezonings, would improve permit efficiency, and end the practice of using housing as a cash machine.

The myth promoted by politicians that the private sector has failed to provide housing supply and affordability ignores the reality that government is the source of the problem.

Government already controls housing.

Municipalities, provincial and federal governments tell builders where and what to build (zoning); when to build (permit approvals); how to build (building code); and how much revenue they require from the project (GST, PTT, DCC’s, permit fees, amenity contributions).

A CMHC study found that up to 20% of housing’s direct costs are government fees and taxes. This does not include unnecessary, high land costs from municipalities obstructing density.

A study by economist Evan Mast revealed housing is a migration chain where more supply at all price points creates more housing for low-income earners. The province can enable the migration chain by overriding obstructive municipal councils.

Instead, they are promising to spend billions of taxpayers’ funds to build housing that the private sector could provide.

There are three major problems with Eby’s proposal:

There is no reason to believe the BC government’s proposal to build middle-class housing is a solution to the highest housing prices in Canada created by their policies.

This column appears Wednesdays in the Times Colonist.

Visit us at vrba.ca and careawards.ca. Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.